ArticleIJID regions2026
Patterns and predictors of readmission among sepsis survivors in a tertiary emergency department in Ethiopia.
Article in IJID regions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Hydrocelectomy Complication Rates in the United States.Research and reports in urology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: Sepsis is a leading cause of critical illness worldwide. Survivors often suffer long-term physical, cognitive, and psychological impairments. Post-sepsis rehospitalization is common but poorly characterized in low-resource settings. We aimed to determine 30/90/180-day readmission rates and predictors after emergency sepsis in Addis Ababa. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients meeting Sepsis-3 criteria (infection with ≥2-point rise in Sequential Organ Failure Assessment [SOFA]) admitted to a tertiary Ethiopian emergency department from 2019-2021. A modified SOFA score (five parameters) was used to define organ dysfunction, as has been validated for resource-limited settings. We recorded patient demographics, comorbidities (including cardiovascular disease and malignancy), acute severity (modified SOFA, septic shock, intensive care unit admission), microbiology, antibiotic duration, and outcomes. Survivors were followed for 180 days for hospital readmissions at any site of suspected infection. Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with 180-day readmission. Results: Of 110 sepsis patients, 39 (35.5%) died during index admission. Among 71 survivors, 32 (45.1%) were readmitted within 180 days (78.1% within 30 days; 15.6% days 31-90; 6.3% days 91-180). Infectious diagnoses accounted for 71.9% of readmissions (often recurrent pneumonia or urinary tract infection). Median time to first readmission was 16 days (interquartile range 5-41). Multivariable analysis showed higher odds of 180-day readmission in younger patients (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.53 per decade decrease in age, 95% confidence interval 1.09-5.87, Conclusions: Nearly half of emergency sepsis survivors were readmitted within 180 days, predominantly within 30 days, and most readmissions were for infection. Predictors included younger age, malignancy status, and length of stay. These findings highlight the need for targeted discharge planning, antimicrobial stewardship, and early follow-up for high-risk patients in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.