Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438278›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in sports and active living2025

Music intervention in precision shooting: mechanisms, effects, and future directions-a literature review.

Yuqian Lan, Yubo Wang, Wenqiang Wu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in sports and active living, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yuqian LanSchool of Education, Beijing Sport University, BeiJing, China.
Yubo WangSchool of Education, Beijing Sport University, BeiJing, China.
Wenqiang WuSchool of Education, Beijing Sport University, BeiJing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous studies have consistently shown that non-invasive musical stimulation can facilitate physical performance, particularly through fast-tempo, high-volume, and rhythmically strong music. Yet, it remains unclear whether slow-tempo, moderate-volume music exerts only inhibitory effects, or whether it might offer distinct benefits in certain contexts. In precision sports such as shooting, athletes must maintain dynamic balance of the body and firearm, physiological and psychological stability, and fine neural regulation. Whether fast-tempo, high-volume stimulation disrupts this optimal state is still unknown. This study therefore examines the bidirectional effects of non-invasive musical stimulation on shooting performance, with a focus on underlying mechanisms, potential benefits, and future directions, and specifically investigates whether slow-tempo, moderate-volume music may more effectively enhance shooters' performance compared to fast-tempo, high-volume stimulation.

Indexed as

arousalelite shootermusicshootingshooting performance

Identifiers

PMID41438278
PMCPMC12719416

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.