ReviewGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025
Trauma-informed care (TIC) in low- and middle-income countries: A scoping review of organisational implementation efforts.
Review in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Organisational readiness and preparedness for trauma-informed practice across UK frontline services: a mixed-methods study.European journal of psychotraumatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to an increased awareness of the prevalence and impact of trauma, "trauma-informed care" (TIC) was developed as an organisational framework aiming to centre the needs of survivors of trauma. TIC proposes that organisations can reduce trauma exposure by embedding specific principles (e.g., safety and trust) at every level of an organisation, improving the organisation for both service users and providers. Recent reviews of TIC implementation efforts have demonstrated its use in diverse settings; however, studies are overwhelmingly situated in high-income, predominantly English-speaking countries. Rather than reflecting a lack of TIC efforts in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), these findings may be a result of the newness of the term TIC. To create a more inclusive evidence map, the current review captures efforts conducted in LMICs that may or may not use the label of TIC but align with the organisational approaches and key principles of TIC. A search of four databases and review of relevant references yielded 3,091 results, of which 255 met the inclusion criteria. Implementation efforts took place across 39 LMICs. The vast majority included involvement of another country, most commonly the United States. Approximately 90% of efforts were implemented within medical settings, and 69% focused on the TIC principle of cultural, historical and gender issues. The results of the current review have both theoretical and applied implications for TIC research. They query how and by whom TIC is conceptualised and defined, and how TIC aligns with other global research approaches. Results also highlight the need for organisational TIC interventions to conduct comprehensive baseline assessments of current efforts before implementing new efforts to avoid unintentional duplication. As the adoption of TIC frameworks becomes more widespread, it is imperative to increase research efforts aimed at developing a more thorough and inclusive definition of TIC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.