Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438263›Full record

ReviewGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2025

Decolonizing mental health: Rethinking implementation science from the ground up.

Felipe Agudelo-Hernández, Lina Valeria Cuadrado, Andrés Camilo Delgado-Reyes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Felipe Agudelo-HernándezDepartment of Mental Health, Dirección Territorial de Salud de Caldas, Manizales, Colombia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8356-8878
Lina Valeria CuadradoUniversidad El Bosque, Colombia.
Andrés Camilo Delgado-ReyesPsychology, Universidad de Manizales, Colombia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Implementation science plays a crucial role in effectively translating scientific knowledge into sustainable, evidence-based health practices. This perspective article focuses on some Latin American experiences, highlighting the limitations of applying methodologies developed in the Global North to settings marked by structural inequalities, economic constraints and cultural diversity. The included experiences examine a range of programs, such as the national Breastfeeding and Feeding Strategy, the evaluation of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program in Chile and the community component of Mental Health Gap Action Programme in Colombia. Other contributions explore professional training initiatives and offer critical reflections on frameworks, such as the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance. The reflections call for strengthening local capacities, fostering meaningful South-South and South-North collaborations, and advancing a context-sensitive, equity-oriented approach to implementation science that supports the development of more adaptive, effective and just health systems.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationEpistemologyImplementation ScienceLatin AmericaMental Health

Identifiers

PMID41438263
PMCPMC12720384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.