ArticleCase reports in endocrinology2025
Peritoneal Inclusion Cyst Mimicking Adrenal Pathology in a Young Man: A Rare Case Report.
Article in Case reports in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Peritoneal Inclusion Cyst Mimicking Adrenal Pathology in a Young Man: A Rare Case Report.Case reports in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peritoneal inclusion cysts (PICs) are rare, benign, and fluid-filled lesions most commonly seen in women of reproductive age, typically associated with a history of abdominal surgery, trauma, or inflammatory conditions. Occurrence in males, especially without predisposing factors, is exceedingly uncommon and can pose significant diagnostic challenges due to their nonspecific clinical and radiological features. We report the case of a 19-year-old male who presented with chronic right lower quadrant abdominal pain persisting for 4 months. Initial sonography revealed an 80 × 50 mm cystic lesion between the liver and kidney, with subsequent imaging-including contrast-enhanced computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging-suggesting an adrenal cyst. Functional and serological workups for adrenal and hydatid pathology were negative. Due to the lesion's size and persistent symptoms, surgical excision was performed. Intraoperatively, the cyst was found in the retroperitoneal space adjacent to, but not adherent to, the adrenal gland. Histopathological and immunohistochemical analyses confirmed the diagnosis of a PIC. The patient's postoperative recovery was uneventful. This case illustrates the diagnostic complexity of PICs in atypical patient populations. The lesion's radiological resemblance to adrenal or other retroperitoneal cystic masses led to initial misdiagnosis and extensive workup. Literature review reveals very few similar cases in males without prior surgery or inflammation. PICs should be considered in the differential diagnosis of cystic abdominal lesions, even in young males without typical risk factors. Accurate diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical assessment, imaging, and histopathological evaluation to ensure appropriate management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.