ArticleSAGE open medicine2025
Use of intensive care unit versus dedicated ventilators for noninvasive ventilation in China: A secondary analysis of a prospective observational study.
Article in SAGE open medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of intensive care unit ventilators versus dedicated noninvasive ventilators when used for noninvasive ventilation. Methods: This was a secondary analysis of data from a multicenter prospective observational study. Eligible patients were recruited from 17 hospitals in China between September 2017 and September 2021. Inclusion criteria were restricted to those receiving noninvasive ventilation for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. The type of ventilator used was determined at the discretion of the treating clinicians. The primary objective was to compare clinical outcomes between intensive care unit ventilators and dedicated noninvasive ventilation ventilators for noninvasive ventilation delivery. Key outcomes included noninvasive ventilation failure rate, 28-day mortality, intensive care unit length of stay, and hospital length of stay. Results: A total of 2054 patients were enrolled, with 5% ( Conclusions: The use of intensive care unit ventilators for noninvasive ventilation is uncommon in China. Based on low-level evidence, intensive care unit ventilators are not associated with a difference in mortality compared with dedicated noninvasive ventilation ventilators, but are linked to earlier endotracheal intubation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.