ArticleJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Improved Identification of Occult Peritoneal Endometriosis Using ABCt.
Article in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-augmented lesion recognition of peritoneal endometriosis: a novel technique.F&S reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Peritoneal endometriosis is the most common form of endometriosis and often overlooked due to its variable and nonpigmented appearance. Despite advances, identifying occult lesions remains challenging. The Aqua Blue Contrast Technique (ABCt), using retroperitoneal methylene blue infusion, was developed to enhance lesion visibility. Method: A total of 126 specimens from 14 women undergoing laparoscopic surgery for peritoneal endometriosis were evaluated using a sequential inspection protocol: initial visual assessment by a gynecology resident, followed by an experienced surgeon, and finally after applying the ABCt. The primary outcome was the number of endometriosis lesions identified by each observer. Secondary outcomes included lesion distribution and positive predictive values. Results: In excised specimens, 78 (61.9%) of them were histologically confirmed as endometriosis. Endometriosis lesions were distributed as follows: posterior pelvic sidewall, 35 (44.9%); anterior pelvic sidewall, 22 (28.2%); and cul-de-sac, 21 (26.9%). For total specimen counts, the surgeon identified 59/78 lesions from 76 specimens (75.6%), and the resident 43/78 from 52 specimens (55.1%). Compared with these groups, ABCt identified 24.4% more lesions than the surgeon and 44.9% more than the resident. Subgroup analysis confirmed that ABCt achieved significantly higher detection rates than the resident across all pelvic sites and outperformed the surgeon at the cul-de-sac and posterior pelvic sidewall. Conclusions: Retroperitoneal contrast staining with ABCt improves the intraoperative detection of occult and nonpigmented peritoneal endometriosis lesions, supporting more comprehensive excision and reducing the chance of missed lesions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.