Observational studyJSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons
Proficiency in Laparoscopic Training: online versus Onsite Suturing Courses.
Observational study in JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Laparoscopic suturing is a key skill in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery but remains technically demanding. Traditional training has relied on in-person courses, which became less accessible during the COVID-19 pandemic. This study compares the effectiveness of an online simulation-based suturing course with a conventional onsite training program. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted from January 2020 to October 2023. A total of 151 gynecology trainees participated. A total of 62 attended a 3-day onsite course using physical simulation systems with one mentor per 4 participants. A total of 89 completed a 5-day online course using home-based simulators with one mentor guiding the entire group. All trainees completed the same pre and postcourse assessments measuring precision, knot quality, and task completion time. Statistical analysis included paired and independent tests with significance set at a standard level. Results: Both groups significantly improved in precision and time. The onsite group showed greater improvement in knot quality and total score. The online group had higher baseline precision and showed slightly greater precision gains. After adjusting for baseline scores, the onsite group had greater overall improvement. Conclusions: Both onsite and online laparoscopic suturing courses significantly enhance technical performance. Onsite training showed a modest advantage, likely due to real-time feedback and hands-on guidance. Nonetheless, online simulation represents a viable, scalable option for surgical training, especially in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.