ReviewCommunicative & integrative biology2026
Quantum mechanics in drug design: Progress, challenges, and future frontiers.
Review in Communicative & integrative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- The Influence of Hydroxyl Group on Nerve Excitability Blockade by Limonene and Its Hydroxylated Metabolites, Perillyl Alcohol and Carveol.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in drug discovery from advanced molecular representation to pipeline applications.Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Quantum mechanics has revolutionized computational drug discovery by addressing fundamental limitations of classical approaches. Its significance lies in accurately modeling electronic phenomena crucial for drug-target interactions, including polarization, charge transfer, and covalent reactivity, which classical force fields inadequately represent. This comprehensive review examines quantum mechanical methods in pharmaceutical applications from 2020 to 2025. The literature search methodology employed PubMed, Web of Science, and arXiv databases (January 2020-January 2025), focusing on improvements in density functional theory, QM/MM implementations, machine-learned force fields, and alchemical free energy protocols. We critically evaluate 156 primary research articles and 42 review papers, analyzing performance metrics from community benchmarking studies, including SAMPL, GMTKN55, and pharmaceutical consortia datasets. The review encompasses methodological advances, practical applications, and regulatory considerations for quantum-enhanced drug discovery. Quantum mechanical enhancements provide substantial benefits for specific challenging cases rather than universal improvements across all drug discovery applications. Current methodological innovations have significantly improved computational tractability while maintaining chemical accuracy. A critical evaluation of cost-benefit trade-offs reveals that targeted applications to metal-containing systems, covalent modifications, and polarization-dominated interactions yield the highest return on computational investment. Best practices for reproducible implementation and practical method selection guidelines are crucial for the successful integration of a pharmaceutical pipeline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.