Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438190›Full record

ReviewCommunicative & integrative biology2026

Quantum mechanics in drug design: Progress, challenges, and future frontiers.

Sarfaraz K Niazi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communicative & integrative biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Sarfaraz K NiaziCollege of Pharmacy, University of Illinois Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0513-0336

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantum mechanics has revolutionized computational drug discovery by addressing fundamental limitations of classical approaches. Its significance lies in accurately modeling electronic phenomena crucial for drug-target interactions, including polarization, charge transfer, and covalent reactivity, which classical force fields inadequately represent. This comprehensive review examines quantum mechanical methods in pharmaceutical applications from 2020 to 2025. The literature search methodology employed PubMed, Web of Science, and arXiv databases (January 2020-January 2025), focusing on improvements in density functional theory, QM/MM implementations, machine-learned force fields, and alchemical free energy protocols. We critically evaluate 156 primary research articles and 42 review papers, analyzing performance metrics from community benchmarking studies, including SAMPL, GMTKN55, and pharmaceutical consortia datasets. The review encompasses methodological advances, practical applications, and regulatory considerations for quantum-enhanced drug discovery. Quantum mechanical enhancements provide substantial benefits for specific challenging cases rather than universal improvements across all drug discovery applications. Current methodological innovations have significantly improved computational tractability while maintaining chemical accuracy. A critical evaluation of cost-benefit trade-offs reveals that targeted applications to metal-containing systems, covalent modifications, and polarization-dominated interactions yield the highest return on computational investment. Best practices for reproducible implementation and practical method selection guidelines are crucial for the successful integration of a pharmaceutical pipeline.

Indexed as

Analytical imagingbioinformaticscell biologydevelopmentgene expressiongene repression complexesgene silencinggenetic engineeringproteomicsregulation

Identifiers

PMID41438190
PMCPMC12721093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.