Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438189›Full record

ArticleMedical research archives2025

Inertia-Driven Mitral and Aortic Valves: The Isovolumic Myth.

Neil B Ingels, Matts Karlsson, Morten O Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical research archives, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Neil B IngelsAdjunct Professor; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.
Matts KarlssonProfessor; Division of Applied Thermodynamics and Fluid Mechanics, Department of Management and Engineering, Linköping University Linköping, Sweden.
Morten O JensenProfessor; Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, Arkansas.

Funding

J. NRSA TrainingTL1TR003109 · NCATS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI SEXTON, KEVIN WAYNE · 2019 to 2023
$1.5M
Force Validated Heart Valve Surgical Planning ToolR15HL145585 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI JENSEN, MORTEN OLGAARD · 2019 to 2019
$417k
Enhancing the Force Validated Heart Valve Surgical Planning ToolR15HL177711 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS AT FAYETTEVILLE · PI JENSEN, MORTEN OLGAARD · 2025 to 2025
$415k
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR003109NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL145585NHLBI NIH HHS R15 HL177711
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: For the past century, the Wiggers Diagram has been universally taught as defining the phases of the cardiac cycle. However, the concepts underlying this diagram have never been fully and directly tested on intact, beating hearts. Methods: In vivo datasets from sheep recorded left ventricular and aortic pressures and flows along with simultaneous 4-D coordinates of 30 miniature strategically placed radiopaque markers. This allowed hemodynamic synchronization with tracking of key anatomical landmarks every 16.7 msec to test Wiggers' concepts. Results: The Wiggers Diagram is not supported as there were no consistent isovolumic periods; the mitral valve closed anywhere during the rising phase of left ventricular pressure, and aortic valve closure and mitral valve opening were Conclusions: The Wiggers Diagram describes valve opening and closing solely in terms of pressure differences which can be transmitted almost instantaneously through incompressible blood in the ventricle. However, pressure differences do not open and close the valves;

Identifiers

PMID41438189
PMCPMC12721858

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.