Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438116›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2025

François M M P Baguette, Cláudia Baider, François Benjamin Vincent Florens

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

François M M P BaguetteTropical Island Biodiversity, Ecology and Conservation Pole of Research, Department of Biosciences and Ocean Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Le Réduit, Mauritius.
Cláudia BaiderThe Mauritius Herbarium, Agricultural Services, Ministry of Agro-Industry, Food Security, Blue Economy and Fisheries, Le Réduit, Mauritius.
François Benjamin Vincent FlorensTropical Island Biodiversity, Ecology and Conservation Pole of Research, Department of Biosciences and Ocean Studies, Faculty of Science, University of Mauritius, Le Réduit, Mauritius.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Human activities generate multiple pressures on ecosystems, driving rapid biodiversity loss globally. Oceanic islands and tropical forests are most affected by this situation and within them, epiphytes and lianas are among the most threatened floristic components. Yet, they are often understudied and neglected particularly in restoration projects which instead typically favour planting trees and often overlook ecosystem dynamics and functional interactions. We compared native epiphytes and lianas growing on native pioneer trees (

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationBiodiversityForestsIntroduced SpeciesIslandsMauritiusTreesBiodiversity conservationEcological restorationEcological successionEcosystem dynamicFacilitationHeliophyteMauritiusOrchidsRestoration policy

Identifiers

PMID41438116
PMCPMC12721127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.