ArticleLaryngoscope investigative otolaryngology2025
Postoperative CT and Functional Analysis of New Larynx in Different Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy Procedures.
Article in Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interindividual Variability in Thyroid Cartilage Lamina Width and Its Implications for Personalized Medialization Thyroplasty.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- Extended Transoral Resection of Anterior Commissure Tumors in a Canine Model: Impact on Laryngeal Framework, Glottis, and Vocal Function.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2026Article
- Postoperative CT and Functional Analysis of New Larynx in Different Supracricoid Partial Laryngectomy Procedures.Laryngoscope investigative otolaryngology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare postoperative CT images of different supracricoid partial laryngectomy procedures and to analyze the formation of a new laryngeal. Study Design: Observation and retrospective study. Methods: Imaging data of 16 patients with supracricoid partial laryngectomy surgery were collected before and 6 months after different supracricoid partial laryngectomy surgeries. Parameters of larynx CT images were read and measured by three senior otolaryngologists at different layers. Function analysis of the new larynx was mainly focused on voice and swallowing. Two-way analysis of variance was employed to analyze the course data. Spearman correlation analysis was performed to evaluate the relationships between imaging parameters and mPAS score, as well as between imaging parameters and GARBS scales. Results: In cricohyoidopexy and cricohyoidoepiglottopexy, the body of the hyoid, the residual arytenoid cartilage, and part of the cricoid dorsal plate could be visualized at the same layer. In Tucker procedure, the first display layer of the free edge of the epiglottis was significantly lower than that before operation. The new glottis is shown at the arytenoid layer, most of which is irregular. When compared with the Tucker group, the cricohyoidopexy and cricohyoidoepiglottopexy groups showed a statistical difference in the postoperative distance between the hyoid bone and cricoid cartilage respectively ( Conclusion: All supracricoid partial laryngectomy procedures showed varying degrees of shortening of the new laryngeal body. The shape of the new laryngeal cavity at the narrowest point was different, but none of them affected respiration and pronunciation. Patients could acquire voice and swallowing recovery in all types of SCPL. It is necessary to evaluate postoperative CT images combined with function analysis to make a better understanding of new larynx structure and function in patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.