ArticleiScience2025
The efficacy and safety of interval and post-reTURBT intravesical therapy for bladder cancer.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Re-transurethral resection of bladder tumors (reTURBTs) improves staging and local control in high-risk bladder cancer, posing the clinical challenge of determining the most effective adjuvant intravesical regimen. In this multicenter retrospective study, 174 patients undergoing reTURBT between 2010 and 2024 received either Bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) or pirarubicin/epirubicin (THP/EPI) intravesical therapy, delivered as post-reTURBT instillations alone (PIT) or combined with interval instillations before and after reTURBT (IIT + PIT). We compared recurrence-free survival (RFS) and adverse events across regimens and performed subgroup analyses by tumor characteristics. IIT + PIT significantly prolonged RFS: BCG IIT + PIT conferred a 2.93-fold lower recurrence risk versus BCG PIT (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.