ArticleiScience2025
Leveraging environmental information for enhanced prediction of cardiac readmissions.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SDOH Data as Health Care Data: The Multifaceted, Evolving, and Consequential Role of Law and Policy.Advances in health information science and practice · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting readmission risk for heart failure patients is a hot topic in the field of survival analysis and healthcare. Current models show room for improvement. This study aims to explore the ability of environmental data to improve prediction accuracy. We conducted a retrospective analysis, integrating environmental factors with clinical data. Experiments show that our combined model achieved a 37% higher C-index than the best baseline. Further tests confirmed that adding any single environmental feature consistently boosted the performance of all baseline models. In addition, environmental data alone have clear limitations. Models using only these variables performed significantly worse than those incorporating clinical features. This indicates that environmental factors are powerful supplements, not replacements, for established clinical predictors. In conclusion, our findings provide strong evidence that environmental information serves as a valuable and complementary tool, significantly improving the accuracy of heart failure readmission-risk prediction when used alongside clinical data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.