ArticleiScience2025
Dynamic neural processing of self-other synchronization error in interpersonal coordination.
Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The human capacity to produce precisely synchronized actions with others is critical for everyday cooperative activities. Such interpersonal coordination is supported by dynamic neural processes that minimize discrepancies between the movements of self and others. Here we use EEG and movement data from 28 pairs of participants performing an improvised joint synchronization task to investigate how the brain continuously tracks self-other synchronization error. Results revealed a central role of the dorsal visual stream dynamically balancing the neural tracking of self-other error depending on leadership roles. We found stronger neural tracking when following, evidenced by higher EEG-error coherence, suggesting a greater need for adaptation in this role. In contrast, leading was characterized by weaker coherence that peaked earlier, suggesting greater involvement of predictive top-down processes driven by motor regions, facilitated by knowledge of upcoming self-other error. Our findings provide insights into key neural processes underpinning interpersonal coordination and related disorders.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.