Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41438034›Full record

ArticleiScience2025

Dynamic neural processing of self-other synchronization error in interpersonal coordination.

Manuel Varlet, Sylvie Nozaradan, Peter E Keller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iScience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel VarletThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Sylvie NozaradanThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.
Peter E KellerThe MARCS Institute for Brain, Behaviour and Development, Western Sydney University, Penrith, NSW, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The human capacity to produce precisely synchronized actions with others is critical for everyday cooperative activities. Such interpersonal coordination is supported by dynamic neural processes that minimize discrepancies between the movements of self and others. Here we use EEG and movement data from 28 pairs of participants performing an improvised joint synchronization task to investigate how the brain continuously tracks self-other synchronization error. Results revealed a central role of the dorsal visual stream dynamically balancing the neural tracking of self-other error depending on leadership roles. We found stronger neural tracking when following, evidenced by higher EEG-error coherence, suggesting a greater need for adaptation in this role. In contrast, leading was characterized by weaker coherence that peaked earlier, suggesting greater involvement of predictive top-down processes driven by motor regions, facilitated by knowledge of upcoming self-other error. Our findings provide insights into key neural processes underpinning interpersonal coordination and related disorders.

Indexed as

behavioral neurosciencecognitive neuroscience

Identifiers

PMID41438034
PMCPMC12719764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.