ArticlePragmatic and observational research2025
INSIGHTS Asthma Pragmatic Registry - A Pragmatic Approach to High-Validity Real-World Evidence for Asthma.
Article in Pragmatic and observational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Asthma is a heterogenous disease, and up to 10% of asthma patients have severe disease. While critical, clinical trials in these patients are generally not representative of the broader ambulatory patient population, warranting the need for reliable and rich real-world data to enable clinical, payer, and regulatory decision-making. Currently, observational registries of consented patients rely on longitudinal, clinically rich data to support real-world evidence generation, but are resource intensive. This manuscript describes an asthma pragmatic registry that incorporates rigorous data reliability standards while offering scalability for research. Patients and Methods: The INSIGHTS Asthma Pragmatic Registry is a real-world, retrospective cohort of adult and adolescent patients with moderate-to-severe asthma geographically distributed throughout the United States. The data set is purposely designed to meet data reliability standards of accuracy, completeness, and traceability. Efforts include continuous improvements in the capture of key clinical features (including disease severity) from electronic health records using advanced technology, linkage across electronic health records, medical and pharmacy claims, and death registry, and process to trace data elements back to a source of truth. Results: The pragmatic registry implementation includes patients meeting moderate-to-severe asthma eligibility criteria since Jan 1, 2014, with routine data refreshes, resulting in 9,185 patients meeting eligibility criteria through August 1, 2024. The median age of patients is 53 years. At least two-thirds of patients are female, of white race, and non-Hispanic ethnicity. On average, patients were followed for more than five years. Conclusion: The INSIGHTS Asthma Pragmatic Registry is a new paradigm in observational research, which blends the data reliability and richness of traditional, consented registries while incorporating the flexibility and scale of utilizing routinely collected data. Ongoing efforts include maintaining longitudinality of patient data and improvements to sustain high data reliability per regulatory standards to support this unique data set for asthma research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.