ArticleInternational journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention2026
Deep learning model for identifying significant tricuspid regurgitation using standard 12-lead electrocardiogram.
Article in International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comment on "Deep learning model for identifying significant tricuspid regurgitation using standard 12-lead electrocardiogram".International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Article
- Accuracy of machine learning models for mitral regurgitation severity assessment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the current standard for detecting tricuspid regurgitation (TR); however, it incurs additional costs and is dependent on the operator's skill. In contrast, the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is widely available during initial evaluations. This study aimed to develop deep learning (DL) models using 12-lead ECG signals and clinical features to detect significant TR. Methods: Between 2017 and 2019, a total of 5432 patients who underwent both 12-lead ECG and TTE were eligible for this study. Significant TR was identified in 570 of these patients. The DL model architecture was based on a combination of one-dimensional convolutional neural network, efficient channel attention block, and Multihead Attention modules. The model was trained on data from 3910 patients, tested on 435 patients, and validated using both internal and external cohorts. Results: The diagnostic performance of the DL model using ECG signals, age, and sex to predict significant TR was as follows: an accuracy of 0.762, sensitivity of 0.809, specificity of 0.756, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.857. After incorporating additional factors such as RR interval, QRS duration, corrected QT interval, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension into the DL model, the diagnostic performance remained substantial, with an accuracy of 0.762, sensitivity of 0.836, specificity of 0.752, and an AUC of 0.866. External validation of the DL model showed satisfactory results. Conclusions: Implementing the DL model for ECG interpretation could facilitate the diagnosis of significant TR. However, the clinical utility of this DL model requires further validation and exploration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.