ArticleResuscitation plus2026
Racial differences in cardiac arrest survival: insights from Minnesota metro data and the University of Minnesota extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation cohort.
Article in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: The study explores the association between race, survival and neurological outcomes among out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) patients listed in Minnesota metro and the University of Minnesota Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (UMN-ECPR) program. Methods: This retrospective study included OHCA patients with initial shockable rhythm from two distinct cohorts: the Minnesota metro CARES cohort, treated with conventional CPR and the UMN-ECPR database (2016-2023). Race was categorized as white or non-white. Good neurological outcome was defined as a Cerebral-Performance-Category score of 1-2. Logistic regression analyses examined survival by race, with primary models adjusted for age and gender and exploratory models further adjusted for witnessed status, location, bystander CPR, return-of-spontaneous-circulation, CPR duration. Results: Of 2,700 OHCA patients in the CARES cohort, primarily treated with conventional CPR, 16.5 % were non-white. Compared to white patients, non-whites were younger (mean age 54.0 vs. 64.4 years), more often female (32.8 % vs. 23.6 %), and less likely to receive bystander CPR (52.2 % vs. 60 %). Non-white patients had lower age- and gender-adjusted odds of survival to discharge (OR: 0.64; 95 % CI, 0.5-0.82; Conclusion: Non-white race was linked to worse outcomes in the conventional CPR cohort but not in the ECPR cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.