ReviewResuscitation plus2026
Wolf Creek XVIII Part 1: advancing resuscitation science.
Review in Resuscitation plus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Wolf Creek XVIII Part 2: optimizing time intervals in cardiac arrest care.Resuscitation plus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Wolf Creek Conference, initiated in 1975, provides a unique forum for robust intellectual exchange between thought leaders and scientists from academia and industry focused on advancing the science and practice of cardiac arrest resuscitation. The 50th year anniversary Wolf Creek XVIII Conference was hosted by the Max Harry Weil Institute for Critical Care Research and Innovation in Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, on June 19-21, 2025. A major focus of the conference proceedings was to identify and prioritize knowledge gaps, barriers to translation, and research priorities for six major domains in the field of resuscitation: (1) optimizing time intervals in cardiac arrest care, (2) innovations in defibrillation science, (3) innovations in extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) technology, (4) cardiac arrest survivorship science, (5) transforming clinical trial design in cardiac arrest research, and (6) strategies to optimize international collaboration in cardiac arrest research. In addition, industry scientists and academic investigators were given the opportunity to present and discuss cutting edge innovations. Finally, the "Wolf Creek Innovator Award" competition recognized early career investigators who were challenging current paradigms in resuscitation science. The overall goal was to fuel active discussion and debate among emerging and established experts and steer the future direction of research efforts in the field. This manuscript provides an overview of the conference, which is expanded upon in the individual manuscripts within this special edition of Resuscitation Plus. The intent of these publications is to provide a roadmap for impactful academic and commercial advances in the field of cardiac arrest resuscitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.