SynthesisBJU international2026
Guideline of guidelines: management of small testicular masses.
Synthesis in BJU international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Indirect evidence and cautious sequencing in indeterminate testicular lesions.BJU international · 2026Article
- Sizing up Testicular Masses: Clinical Implications of Lesion Size and Contralateral Biopsy.Cancers · 2026Article
- Multiparametric Ultrasound for Characterisation of Testicular Lesions: Beyond Orchiectomy.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare and summarise the most up to date international guidelines and major recommendations for the management of small testicular masses (STMs).
methodsA systematic search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library up to 1 November 2024. The latest editions of five international guidelines were included in the review: the European Association of Urology 2025; the National Comprehensive Cancer Network 2024; the American Urological Association 2023; the Canadian Urological Association 2022; and the European Society for Medical Oncology 2018. The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE II) tool was applied by two authors (M.T. and G.F.) to assess the quality of these guidelines.
resultsEmerging evidence supports testis-sparing surgery (TSS) as a viable option for managing STMs, showing acceptable oncological outcomes and preservation of gonadal function in select patients. The shared indications for TSS include indeterminate STMs identified on ultrasonography with negative tumour markers, particularly in the case of a solitary testis or of bilateral tumours. Where intra-operative frozen section analysis is available, and confirms a benign lesion, a radical orchidectomy could be avoided.
conclusionConsensus across guidelines favours TSS in suitable cases, balancing oncological control with functional outcomes and informed patient decisions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.