ArticleHaematologica2026
Isolated
Article in Haematologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
NRAS and KRAS mutations, commonly identified alongside ancestral co-mutations, are generally regarded as pathogenic in adults presenting with monocytosis and/or cytopenia(s). However, their significance in isolation is not well defined. We studied a multi-institutional cohort of 52 patients with isolated RAS mutations and found that 26 (50%) did not meet diagnostic criteria for a myeloid neoplasm. Compared to patients with typical chronic myelomonocytic leukemia/myelodysplastic syndrome, these patients exhibited distinctive clinical features, including a younger age (65 years; range, 29-92 years), female predominance (60%), frequent immune-related disorders (39%), and splenomegaly (65%). Mutations predominantly involved KRAS (92%), with 87% affecting codons G12 or G13, and typically occurred at high variant allele frequency (39.0%; range, 2.6-53.0%). In three flow-sorted samples, KRAS/NRAS mutations were detected not only in granulocytes and monocytes but also in lymphocytes, reminiscent of pediatric RASopathies. A subset of patients (7/26, 27%) progressed to develop a myeloid malignancy, with acquisition of additional genetic alterations or the development of dysplasia. These findings challenge the assumption that isolated RAS mutations are sufficient to diagnose myeloid neoplasms. Instead, some cases may reflect adult-onset RASopathies or early clonal proliferations with distinct biological behavior. Recognition of such cases warrants refinement of diagnostic criteria and may influence therapeutic decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.