Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437722›Full record

ArticleMolecular oncology2026

Crucial parameters for precise copy number variation detection in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded solid cancer samples.

Hanne Goris, Vasiliki Siozopoulou, Léon C van Kempen, Anne Sieben, Ella Roelant, Stig Hellemans, Elyne Backx, Laure Sorber, Koen De Winne, Senada Koljenović and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Hanne GorisDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9691-6635
Vasiliki SiozopoulouCenter for Oncological Research (CORE), Molecular Imaging, Pathology, Radiotherapy & Oncology (MIPRO), University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Léon C van KempenDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.
Anne SiebenDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.
Ella RoelantClinical Trial Center (CTC), CRC Antwerp, Antwerp University Hospital University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Stig HellemansDepartment of Computer Science, Adrem Data Lab, University of Antwerp, Belgium.
Elyne BackxDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.
Laure SorberDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.
Koen De WinneDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.
Senada KoljenovićDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.
Karen ZwaenepoelDepartment of Pathology, Antwerp University Hospital, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-9122-0639

Funding

Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek FWO-TBM T003022N
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variations (CNVs) play a crucial role in cancer diagnostics and prognostics, potentially impacting treatment decisions. Ultra-low-pass whole-genome sequencing (ULP-WGS) has emerged as a promising alternative to array-based methods for CNV detection, especially in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. However, sequencing biases and sample heterogeneity necessitate the optimization of CNV detection tools for FFPE sample-derived data. This study evaluates three open-source CNV callers (CNVpytor, ichorCNA, and WisecondorX) using ULP-WGS and compares their performance against a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Our results demonstrate that under optimal experimental conditions, ichorCNA and WisecondorX achieved equal detection of true positive results, with reduced false positive results compared to the SNP array. The SNP array detection pattern differed somewhat from that of the CNV callers, while ichorCNA and WisecondorX had the most comparable detection pattern. We highlight the importance of (pre-)analytical parameters such as neoplastic cell content, sequencing coverage, and bin size selection on CNV detection accuracy. Our findings support the adoption of ULP-WGS-based CNV detection as a robust alternative to SNP arrays, with WisecondorX emerging as the most suitable tool for clinical implementation.

Indexed as

DNA Copy Number VariationsFormaldehydeNeoplasmsParaffin EmbeddingTissue FixationHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideWhole Genome SequencingFormaldehydecancer diagnosticscopy number variationsFFPE tissueSNP arrayULP‐WGS

Identifiers

PMID41437722
PMCPMC13155139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.