Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437631›Full record

Trial reportPain medicine (Malden, Mass.)2026

Efficacy of neck-specific exercises with and without internet-based support on psychological factors in chronic whiplash-associated disorders: secondary analyses of a randomized controlled trial.

Hedvig Zetterberg, Katja Boersma, Anneli Peolsson, Gunnel Peterson

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03022812 (Is E-health a Way to Increase Ability and Health and Make Health Care More Effective in Chronic Whiplash? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03022812 nacompletednot on this map

Is E-health a Way to Increase Ability and Health and Make Health Care More Effective in Chronic Whiplash? A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorLinkoeping UniversityRan2017 to 2020Enrolled140ConditionsWhiplash Associated DisordersArmsNeck-specific exercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hedvig ZetterbergDepartment of Psychology and Social Work, Mid Sweden University, Östersund, SE-831 25, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-4219-5075
Katja BoersmaCenter for Health and Medical Psychology (CHAMP), School of Behavioral, Social, and Legal Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, SE-701 82, Sweden.
Anneli PeolssonDepartment of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, SE-581 83, Sweden.
Gunnel PetersonDepartment of Health Medicine and Caring Sciences, Unit of Physiotherapy, Linköping University, Linköping, SE-581 83, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-2492-0306

Funding

Centre for Clinical Research SörmlandMedical Research Council of Southeast Sweden 844451Medical Research Council of Southeast Sweden 939838Östergötland County Council 676261Östergötland County Council 847691Regional Research Council Mid Sweden 641551Regional Research Council Mid Sweden 838701Regional Research Council Mid Sweden 939243Swedish Research Council 2018-02476Uppsala University Sweden 736751Uppsala University Sweden 854531Uppsala University Sweden 930399Vinnova 2018-02244
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveChronic whiplash-associated disorders (WAD) can involve complex interactions between physical symptoms and psychological factors, and long-term effects of exercise programs are of interest. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a predominantly internet-based neck-specific exercise program (NSEIT) compared with the same neck-specific exercises (NSE) performed at a physiotherapy clinic on psychological outcomes in chronic WAD, including cognitive-behavioral factors (pain catastrophizing, fear-avoidance beliefs, self-efficacy), emotional distress (symptoms of depression, anxiety), and cognitive functioning. A further objective was to assess whether psychological factors moderated treatment effects on the primary outcome, neck-specific disability.

methodsThis secondary analysis was based on a randomized multicenter trial. Participants (n = 140) were randomized to NSEIT or NSE. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3 months, and 15 months. Psychological outcomes were analyzed with mixed-design analysis of variance. Moderation effects were tested by adding interaction terms (psychological factor×group) in linear regression models of neck-specific disability.

resultsNo significant group differences or group×time interactions were found for psychological outcomes. However, there were significant main effects of time for cognitive-behavioral factors and emotional distress in both groups (all P < .01), with small to intermediate effect sizes. Psychological factors did not moderate the treatment effects on neck-specific disability.

conclusionThe internet-based format (NSEIT), involving fewer clinical visits, did not differ from the more comprehensive physiotherapist-led program (NSE) with regard to psychological outcomes. Improvements in cognitive-behavioral factors and emotional distress occurred over time in both groups. The internet-based format might be suitable regardless of psychological characteristics at baseline. CLINICAL

trial registrationwww.ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03022812 (December 20, 2016).

Indexed as

Exercise TherapyInternet-Based InterventionNeck PainWhiplash InjuriesAdultCatastrophizationCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansInternetMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacyTreatment Outcomeinternet-based interventionneck-specific exercisephysiotherapypsychological outcomesrandomized controlled trialwhiplash-associated disorder

Identifiers

PMID41437631
PMCPMC13329190

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.