Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437398›Full record

ArticleAddiction science & clinical practice2025

Developing a collegiate recovery program from the ground up: identifying priorities, promoting collaboration, assessing needs, and offering recommendations.

Mary B Tabit

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Addiction science & clinical practice, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Mary B TabitDepartment of Psychology, University of Scranton, Scranton, 18510-4596, PA, USA. Mary.Tabit@scranton.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAddiction in its many forms is a pervasive public health challenge that afflicts millions of people. With adolescence identified as the at-risk period for developing substance use disorders (SUDs), and young adults in the U.S. steadily demonstrating the highest SUD prevalence rates among individuals aged 12 and older, providing supports to college-aged youth in recovery or recovery curious is critical to promoting positive social, health, and academic outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: Collegiate Recovery Programs (CRP) are proliferating across the nation as a valuable campus resource for students in recovery from SUDs and process addictions. The purpose of this article is to provide an overview and first-person account of developing a CRP at a 4-year institution of higher education in the U.S., over the course of one year, through the lens of a CRP co-director.

conclusionsProgram development, particularly in a space like CRPs where no one “gold standard” model exists, and individualizing programming to campus culture is key, is a time and resource-intensive process that evolves over time. Materials created to support program development are included and recommendations emerging from this experience are discussed.

Indexed as

Program DevelopmentStudentsSubstance-Related DisordersAcademiaAdolescentCooperative BehaviorHumansNeeds AssessmentUnited StatesUniversitiesAddictionCollege student healthCollegiate recovery programCRPProgram developmentRecoverySubstance use

Identifiers

PMID41437398
PMCPMC12849549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.