ArticleBMC oral health2025
Unveiling dental diagnostic dilemmas: a national survey of US dentists.
Article in BMC oral health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Uncovering diagnostic errors in dentistry through critical incident reports: a mixed-methods analysis.BMC health services research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIn dentistry, very little is known about diagnostic errors (DEs) despite their critical role in assessing patient safety. Many DE cases significantly impact the patient’s quality of life and daily function without necessarily causing medical harm. The primary goal of this study was to describe dentists past experiences or observations of DEs and their associated characteristics.
methodsWe conducted a national cross-sectional study of US dentists (May-June, 2021). The primary outcomes were self-reported personal experiences of DEs and observations of DEs made by other dentists. Secondary outcomes included: dental conditions frequently associated with DEs, phase of care, contributory factors, and potential interventions. We also explored the associations between provider demographics and practice characteristics with the primary outcomes.
results627 total responses were received from participants. About 40% of dentists reported observing a DE made by another dentist on a daily or weekly basis, while only 12.4% admitted to personally making a DE. The dental conditions most frequently selected by dentists as associated with DEs included: diseases of pulp, periapical tissues, and other disorders of the teeth and supporting structures (45%), acute and chronic sinusitis (44.6%), and head and neck cancers/neoplasms (43.9%). Younger dentists and those who attended to 61 + patients/week were significantly more likely to report personally making DEs.
conclusionUS Dentists report personally making or observing others making DEs frequently. New, innovative strategies are needed to reduce or eliminate the occurrence of DEs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.