Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437341›Full record

ArticleBMC surgery2025

Hill anti reflux procedure for gastro esophageal reflux disease after sleeve gastrectomy - a single center experience.

Henrik K Thomassen, Villy Våge

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Henrik K ThomassenDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Ulriksdal 8, Bergen, 5009, Norway. henrik.krossoy.thomassen@haraldsplass.no.
Villy VågeDepartment of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haraldsplass Deaconess Hospital, Ulriksdal 8, Bergen, 5009, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLaparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the most performed bariatric procedure but is frequently complicated with postoperative gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). While Roux-en-y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is the standard revision surgery for GERD after LSG, some patients continue to require antireflux medication. The Hill antireflux repair (LHR) offers a potential alternative by restoring the gastroesophageal junction anatomy and augmenting the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressure without fundoplication.

methodsA retrospective single-center study was conducted between 2019 and 2022, including 10 patients who underwent LHR for GERD symptoms following LSG. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the medium and long-term outcomes of LHR in this patient population.

resultsTen patients underwent LHR. Mean preoperative GERDQ-score was 12, improving to 6 at one year and 8 at three years. The use of proton pump inhibitors decreased from 100% preoperative to 30% at three years postoperative. Median LES pressure increased significantly from 8mmHg preoperatively to 23mmHg after applying Hill-sutures. There were no short-term complications. Two patients required revisional surgery due to recurrent hiatal hernia and dysphagia.

conclusionsLHR appears as feasible surgical option for patients with GERD after LSG. Larger, prospective studies with objective postoperative assessments are needed to validate long-term outcomes and to define its therapeutic role.

Indexed as

Bariatric SurgeryGastrectomyGastroesophageal RefluxLaparoscopyPostoperative ComplicationsAdultEsophageal Sphincter, LowerFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedReoperationRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAnti-reflux surgeryGERDRevisional surgerySleeve gastrectomy

Identifiers

PMID41437341
PMCPMC12836976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.