Trial reportEuropean journal of medical research2025
Development and validation of a machine learning-driven framework for differentiating pediatric bronchopneumonia from lobar pneumonia: a multicenter investigation.
Trial report in European journal of medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational proteomics to enhance personalized treatment of COVID-19 and Long COVID.Clinical proteomics · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis investigation aims to establish and substantiate a machine learning-driven predictive framework designed to precisely distinguish between pediatric bronchopneumonia and lobar pneumonia. This endeavor seeks to elevate the accuracy of early clinical support, refine treatment decision-making, and curtail superfluous medical interventions.
methodsThis study was executed at Siyang Hospital, enrolling 2304 pediatric patients diagnosed with either bronchopneumonia or lobar pneumonia from January 2020 to December 2024. Participants were randomized in a 7:3 ratio into training (n = 1612) and testing (n = 692) sets, supplemented by an external validation set (n = 454) to evaluate the model's generalizability. Hematological and serum biochemical parameters were gathered, with feature selection conducted using eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Support Vector Machine-Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE), and Random Forest algorithms. A suite of twelve machine learning models-including Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and Support Vector Machines-was developed, with parameters fine-tuned through five-fold cross-validation. Model efficacy was assessed via receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score, while feature significance was quantified using SHAP values. A nomogram was formulated based on critical features, its clinical value affirmed through calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Statistical evaluations incorporated Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square tests, and DeLong tests, with a threshold of P < 0.05 denoting significance.
resultsNotable disparities emerged between the bronchopneumonia (n = 1868) and lobar pneumonia (n = 436) cohorts across several hematological markers, such as large platelet count (P-LCT), Lymphocyte percentage (LYM%), and creatinine (CREA) (P < 0.01). Feature selection pinpointed P-LCT, LYM%, and CREA as key predictors. The Gradient Boosting model demonstrated exemplary performance, yielding an AUC of 0.947 (95% CI 0.934-0.960) in the training set, 0.968 (95% CI 0.954-0.982) in the testing set, and 0.989 (95% CI 0.981-0.997) in the external validation set, underscoring its outstanding discriminative prowess and robust generalizability. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis underscored P-LCT (Mean Absolute SHAP: 0.057) and LYM% (0.065) as predominant predictors, exhibiting a strong correlation with disease severity. The nomogram attained an AUC of 0.962, with impeccable calibration (C-index = 0.962), and DCA substantiated considerable net benefit at moderate risk thresholds.
conclusionThe Gradient Boosting model, as delineated in this study, markedly advances the differential diagnosis of pediatric bronchopneumonia and lobar pneumonia, delivering high precision and resilience. It serves as an efficacious and dependable clinical decision-support instrument. By incorporating pivotal biomarkers like P-LCT and LYM%, this model illuminates pathophysiological traits, enhances antibiotic stewardship, and guides hospitalization choices, thereby diminishing healthcare resource wastage and ameliorating patient outcomes. These insights furnish vital backing for precision medicine and acute care management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.