SynthesisMolecular autism2025
A systematic review of statistical learning in autism spectrum disorder.
Synthesis in Molecular autism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Social enhancement of associative learning in neurotypical, speaking autistic, and minimally speaking autistic preschoolers.Molecular autism · 2026Article
- Reduced flexibility in predictive tuning and contextual adaptation in autism: an EEG and behavioral study.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A preliminary study of implicit statistical learning in non-clinical young adults exposed to early adversity.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Statistical learning, the ability to detect and extract statistical regularities from the environment, has been proposed as a key mechanism underlying language, social, and cognitive development. Numerous studies have examined statistical learning abilities in autistic individuals to test the hypothesis that differences contribute to the behavioral presentation of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Findings have been inconsistent, with variations in methodology, sensory modality, and participant characteristics complicating the interpretation of results. The current study presents a systematic review of statistical, implicit, and procedural learning studies in autism, considering how statistical learning abilities vary across (a) modality (e.g., auditory versus visual), (b) methodology (e.g., behavioral versus neuroimaging), and (c) task design, and considering the influence of language and cognitive abilities. Results across 37 studies in visual and auditory modalities indicate few behavioral differences in statistical learning abilities (with the exception of slowed reaction times in autism), and that learning may benefit from extended exposure and explicit cues. In contrast, neuroimaging findings reveal substantial variability in the neural mechanisms implicated in these tasks, with evidence suggesting compensatory cognitive processing in some autistic samples. Individual differences in language, cognitive abilities, and autism-related traits strongly influence statistical learning outcomes. Significant gaps remain, particularly in the inclusion of minimally verbal individuals and those with intellectual disabilities. Methodological heterogeneity, skewed gender and sociodemographic sample characteristics, and inconsistent neural findings highlight the need for more standardized approaches in future research. Understanding the mechanisms of statistical learning in autism has critical implications for language and cognitive interventions, emphasizing the importance of individualized support strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.