ArticleBMC medical ethics2025
Examining the experiences of donor relatives in the organ donation decision process: a qualitative study in Türkiye.
Article in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIncreasing donor consent rates in countries with low post-mortem donation rates such as Türkiye is paramount. This study explores the experiences of donor relatives in Türkiye who approved post mortem organ donation after brain death, aiming to identify emotional, cognitive, and ethical factors influencing their decisions and post-decision experiences, to inform strategies for increasing consent rates in developing countries.
methodsThis qualitative study involved semi-structured interviews with eight donor relatives who consented to organ donation, and data were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsTwo main fields were identified: (1) Factors influencing the donation decision, with themes: (a) decision-related factors, (b) health system factors, and (c) individual factors; and (2) post-decision experiences, with themes: (a) satisfaction with the decision, (b) curiosity about the recipient, (c) meaning of donation, and (d) creating donation awareness.
conclusionEmpathic motivations, previously stated wishes, the attitude of healthcare professionals, and understanding brain death influence the decisions of donors' relatives. Trust in healthcare professionals helps reduce ethical uncertainty, contributing to a more confident and informed decision-making process. The study found that concerns during the decision-making process and uncertainties such as 'What will happen next?' were replaced by spiritual satisfaction and contentment after the decision. The research results provide evidence-based insights into the organ donation decision-making process and offer recommendations for improving public perception and increasing consent rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.