ArticleBMC public health2025
Healthy ageing in place: perspectives on age-friendliness in 'local' communities.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAge-friendly communities are designed to support older adults in staying healthy, active, and engaged in society as they age. While the built environment plays an important role in their wellbeing, little is known about what shapes older adults’ views of community age-friendliness. This study explored how mid-to-older aged adults perceive community age-friendliness, and how these perceptions influence ageing in place.
methodsSemi-structured interviews (in-person/online) were conducted with 21 community-dwelling adults (55–75 years; mean age 65.0 ± 5.5) from two Scottish local authorities with high deprivation (September 2023 – March 2024). Guided by maps of their local area, barriers and facilitators to community age-friendliness were charted to the WHO Age-Friendly Cities, Place Standard and Ageing in Place frameworks, and perceptions of localness were explored.
resultsParticipants varied in physical activity, frailty, and loneliness levels, and experienced declining community age-friendliness. Physical barriers included neglected facilities, poorly accessible homes and spaces, and environmental hazards. Social barriers included declining access to social spaces due to rising costs, reduced hours and service closures. Service-related barriers included digital exclusion, ageism, safety concerns and reduced healthcare access. Perceptions of localness were shaped by (i) accessible and preferred transport options, with local areas shrinking as health declines; (ii) distance to essential services; and (iii) places where participants had social ties.
conclusionsThe perceived deterioration of local places underpins a decline of community age-friendliness. To support older adults to age well, policymakers must consider the effects of declining mobility, access to- and closure -of essential facilities for older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.