SynthesisBMC pregnancy and childbirth2025
Global prevalence of neonatal mortality in preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Time to diagnosis of acute kidney injury and its predictors among outborn neonates in India: a competing-risk analysis of tele-ICU network data (2022-2024).The Lancet regional health. Southeast Asia · 2026Article
- Prevalence and associated factors of EPDS-defined depressive symptoms in fathers of preterm infants admitted to the NICU: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe leading cause of neonatal mortality is preterm birth, with the risk of death in the first days of life increasing as the gestational age decreases. The objective was to estimates the global prevalence of neonatal mortality in preterms through a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
methodsObservational cohort studies were included irrespective of temporal or linguistic confines. Studies reporting the prevalence of newborns delivered before 37 complete weeks of gestation, with deaths within 28 days postpartum, were included. The bibliographic search and selection were conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed/Medline, SciVerse Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL Information Systems, Scientific Electronic Library Online, EMBASE, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature and gray literature. Quality assessment was carried out using the Joanna Briggs Institute appraisal tool. Meta-analysis was conducted utilizing RStudio software.
resultsA total of 47 articles were included. Of them, 29 studies analyzed general preterm birth (delivery before 37 complete weeks of gestation), three studies evaluated extremely preterm (< 28 weeks), seven studies assessed very preterm (28 to less than 32 weeks), and five studies examined moderate to late preterm infants (32 to 37 weeks). The pooled prevalence of neonatal mortality was 8%. When considering only the subgroup of general preterm, the mortality rate was 10%. Extremely preterm infants had a mortality rate of 40%, very preterm infants had a rate of 15%, and moderate to late preterm infants had a mortality rate close to 0%. High heterogeneity was found (I² = 100%; Q-test p = 0; wide prediction interval). Meta-regression analyses were conducted to examine the observed heterogeneity. Factors such as Human Development Index and admission to NICUs influenced neonatal mortality. In terms of quality assessment, 89.1% of the studies were considered adequate in representing the target population. Regarding sample size, 30.4% of studies lacked calculations, hindering evaluation.
conclusionThe prevalence of neonatal mortality was 8 per 100 premature births. The prevalence of neonatal mortality varied according to gestational age at birth. These data should be interpreted with caution as it was not possible to identify all sources of heterogeneity in the meta-analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.