ArticleSalud colectiva2025
[Becoming objects in the face of artificial intelligence].
Article in Salud colectiva, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This essay offers a critical reflection on the effects of the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) on subjectivity, labor, and institutions, drawing on contributions from Latin American thought on science and technology, as well as from contemporary philosophical debates. We understand AI as yet another - though not minor - chapter in the historical process of the dehumanization of science, as it replaces relational and symbolic thinking with an algorithmic logic that threatens to turn subjects into objects. From this perspective, the essay questions the resurgence of the idea of progress, now underpinned by AI, which - through its radical anti-humanism - seeks to establish itself as a hegemonic rationality, suppressing political action, otherness, and human language. In light of this scenario, we advocate for the recovery of small-scale, relational, and artisanal institutional models that safeguard the human against technocratic dominance. To this end, the text revisits the critical thought of authors such as Gadamer, Arendt, and Sadin. It constitutes an urgent call to reconfigure our social and political practices in order to confront the effects of AI on the life of social collectives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.