ArticleClinical and experimental medicine2025
MASLD versus MAFLD in lean steatotic liver disease: diagnostic overlap, inclusivity, and the metabolically healthy lean phenotype.
Article in Clinical and experimental medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Integrated Plasma and Tissue Lipid Profiling Demonstrates a Distinctive Metabolic Profile in MAFLD-Associated Non-Cirrhotic Hepatocellular Carcinoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lean non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) presents a unique clinical phenotype increasingly recognized within the evolving nomenclature of metabolic dysfunction–associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and metabolic dysfunction–associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). This study evaluated the diagnostic applicability of both frameworks in lean Egyptian patients and explored their capacity to encompass metabolically healthy lean phenotypes. Ninety ultrasonography confirmed lean NAFLD patients (BMI < 25 kg/m²) were reassessed using MAFLD and MASLD criteria. Clinical, metabolic, and biochemical parameters, alongside non-invasive fibrosis indices and transient elastography, were compared across classifications. Among all patients, 87.8% met MASLD and 77.8% fulfilled MAFLD criteria, showing substantial overlap yet minor classification differences. MASLD identified a slightly higher proportion of lean cases, whereas MAFLD more stringently captured those with overt metabolic dysfunction. Clinical, biochemical, and fibrosis parameters were comparable among groups (p > 0.05). However, 12.2% of patients remained unclassified under either definition, representing a metabolically healthy lean with steatotic liver disease (MHL-SLD) subgroup. In lean steatotic liver disease, MASLD and MAFLD show substantial diagnostic overlaps and identify similar patient profiles with no significant metabolic or fibrosis differences. MASLD includes slightly more patients, yet without clear clinical distinction. Refinement of criteria may be needed to better capture metabolically healthy lean individuals with liver steatosis (MHL-SLD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.