Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437155›Full record

ReviewAdvances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology2026

Development of Cell Culture Media for Cultivated Meat Production.

M J Post

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in biochemical engineering/biotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

M J PostCARIM, Physiology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands. mpost@mosameat.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The culture medium is a central part of the cultivated meat technology, from biological, economical, and safety perspectives. Many cues to drive proliferation or differentiation of cells relevant for cultivated meat are biochemical and are therefore part of the medium. Traditionally, these cues came from fetal bovine serum (FBS), but that has been replaced by a set of components, often of recombinant origin. The culture medium is the costliest input in cultivated meat and therefore subject to intense efforts to reduce cost through simplification, by downgrading components, by replacing components with cheaper alternatives, and by being cognizant of appropriate timing of administration. In addition, reducing the volume of medium per kg of output needed is a subject of research and development. These modifications are all bounded by the need for culture medium to be food-safe and preferably chemically defined. Importantly, the use of medium needs to be as efficient as possible through smart feeding and judicious medium regimes to reduce waste to a minimum. Metabolic models and AI tools will further facilitate medium development leading to less experimental waste. It is expected that this progress will continue for many years leading to ever better media at lower cost, enabling commercialization of cultivated meat.

Indexed as

Cell Culture TechniquesCulture MediaMeatAnimalsHumansIn Vitro MeatCulture MediaBioprocessCell cultureCultivated meatMedium

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.