Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437122›Full record

ArticleJournal of eating disorders2025

Rethinking the bodily self: evidence from the enfacement illusion in women at risk for eating disorders.

Jade Portingale, Isabel Krug, Tamsyn E Van Rheenen, Litza Kiropoulos, Cali F Bartholomeusz, Helen Nasser, David Butler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of eating disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jade PortingaleSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia. jade.portingale@unimelb.edu.au.
Isabel KrugSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Tamsyn E Van RheenenDepartment of Psychiatry, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Litza KiropoulosSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Cali F BartholomeuszSchool of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, 3010, Australia.
Helen NasserLa Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
David ButlerFaculty of Psychology and Counselling, The Cairnmillar Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBodily illusion research has demonstrated that altered bodily-self-perception in eating disorders (EDs) may be linked to abnormalities in the integration of sensory bodily signals. Experiencing bodily illusions can also temporarily reduce body image disturbance. Whether similar alterations in multisensory integration processes extend to self-face representation and whether face-based multisensory illusions can reduce face or body image disturbance remains unclear. This study investigated whether susceptibility to the enfacement illusion differs based on ED risk status and whether experiencing the illusion reduces face and body image disturbance.

methodsThe sample included 226 women classified as high (n = 102) or low (n = 124) ED risk, who underwent an enfacement illusion induction procedure involving synchronous (ilillusion-inducing) versus asynchronous (control) visuo-motor stimulation (via facial mimicry) between their own face and an unfamiliar person's face. Illusion strength was assessed subjectively (via self-report) and objectively (via a self-face recognition task), alongside pre- and post-illusion face and body image outcomes.

resultsSynchronous interpersonal visuo-motor stimulation led to modest changes in self-face recognition (i.e., the other person's face came to be perceived as more similar to one's own); however, these changes were not modulated by ED risk status (high versus low). Cognitive-affective responses to the illusion diverged in unexpected ways. Low ED-risk participants reported reduced body dissatisfaction and dysmorphic concern following synchronous interpersonal visuo-motor stimulation, whilst high ED-risk participants reported increased head and body dissatisfaction following both synchronous and asynchronous stimulation.

conclusionThese findings suggest that the multisensory processes underlying self-face representation, and ultimately supporting self-recognition and the integrity of self-other boundaries, may not be disrupted in individuals with elevated ED symptomatology. This observation may challenge the notion of a globally disrupted sense of bodily self in EDs, at least with respect to self-face processing. Instead, current results suggest that ED-related body image disturbance may reflect altered higher-order evaluative or affective processing of self-related social information rather than a fundamental deficit in multisensory integration.

Indexed as

Body imageEating disordersEnfacement illusionFace perceptionMultisensory integrationSelf-perception

Identifiers

PMID41437122
PMCPMC12837083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.