ArticleArchives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique2025
Gender norms in sexual and reproductive health and rights: insights from young Angolan women and the development of a context-specific questionnaire (2021-2022).
Article in Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRestrictive gender norms and persistent inequalities continue to constrain women’s lives globally, particularly in relation to sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). In Angola, despite international and national commitments, young women face enduring SRHR challenges, including high rates of adolescent pregnancy and limited access to contraception and maternal healthcare. These reflect systemic health constraints and the normative structures shaping expectations, behaviours, and entitlements. Addressing SRHR thus requires attention to both service provision and the gendered norms that sustain inequality. Yet, measuring gender norms remains methodologically complex: many instruments conflate individual attitudes with collective expectations or rely on indirect proxies, reducing conceptual precision.
methodsTo address this gap, a mixed-methods study incorporating Rash analysis was undertaken. Drawing on a literature review and qualitative approaches, contextually salient SRHR topics were identified, and an eleven-item gender norms questionnaire was developed. The questionnaire was embedded in a larger cross-sectional survey of 2,081 young women aged 18–24 in urban and rural areas across three provinces. Descriptive statistics were applied to socio-demographic variables and gender norm items.
resultsProvincial contrasts emerged: participants in better-resourced provinces reported lower rates of adolescent pregnancy and intimate partner violence, alongside stronger normative support for SRHR. Endorsement was most consistent for education and bodily autonomy, while norms relating to reproductive rights and equality within relationships were more contested. Rasch analysis indicated sound psychometric properties and adequate coverage of the latent construct, although some provincial variation in item functioning was observed.
conclusionsPsychometric techniques identified minor tensions within and between SRHR topics; yet overall, the questionnaire demonstrated suitability as a composite measure. Thematic and geographical variations in perceived normative support highlighted how gender norms intersect with broader inequalities. Integrating the socio-demographic analysis, and an aggregate gender norms index, and item-level differentiation provides a strong basis for intervention design. Such integration can support contextually grounded, gender-empowering initiatives that strengthen young women’s SRHR within their specific socio-economic realities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.