Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437108›Full record

ArticleBMC research notes2025

Perceived knowledge and intention to prepare advance directives: a cross-sectional study of Thai gynecologic cancer patients and families.

Nipat Bock Pichayayothin, Wanachaporn Pipattanawong, Natacha Phoolcharoen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC research notes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nipat Bock PichayayothinDevelopmental Psychology Program, Faculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Wanachaporn PipattanawongDevelopmental Psychology Program, Faculty of Psychology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natacha PhoolcharoenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand. phnatacha@gmail.com.

Funding

Ratchadapisek Sompoch Fund, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University RA60/115
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine perceived and objective knowledge of advance directives (AD), attitudes toward end-of-life care, and factors associated with intention to prepare AD among Thai gynecologic cancer patients and their family members attending a tertiary hospital in Bangkok.​ RESULTS DESCRIPTION: A cross-sectional survey was conducted with 101 patients and 105 accompanying family members recruited between August 2017 and January 2018. Over 60% of both groups had never heard of AD and mean objective knowledge scores were low (3.4/8 for patients and 3.7/8 for family members), with common misconceptions including equating AD with euthanasia. Most participants preferred a natural death without life-prolonging measures. Yet only 6% of patients and 1% of family members had completed an AD, while 22% and 27%, respectively, reported an intention to prepare one. Multiple regression showed that perceived knowledge was the only significant predictor of intention to prepare an AD for both patients (B = 0.339, p < 0.001) and family members (B = 0.246, p < 0.001), suggesting that interventions that enhance perceived understanding may strengthen engagement in advance care planning.

Indexed as

Advance DirectivesFamilyGenital Neoplasms, FemaleHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeIntentionAdultAdvance Care PlanningAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSoutheast Asian PeopleSurveys and QuestionnairesTerminal CareAdvance directivesend-of-life caregynecologic cancerperceived knowledgeThailand

Identifiers

PMID41437108
PMCPMC12836913

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.