ArticleArthritis research & therapy2025
Explainable machine learning for orthopedic decision-making: predicting functional outcomes of total hip replacement from gait biomechanics.
Article in Arthritis research & therapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify subpopulations of patients with hip osteoarthritis who exhibit distinct adaptations in gait biomechanics, and to evaluate subpopulation-specific effects of total hip replacement on gait biomechanics. Three datasets were analyzed: (1) a cohort of 109 unilateral hip osteoarthritis patients before total hip replacement, (2) a subset of the first dataset of 63 patients re-evaluated after total hip replacement and (3) a control group of 56 healthy individuals. For all participants, three-dimensional joint angle and moment waveforms of the pelvis, ipsilateral hip and knee, as well as sagittal-plane ankle motion and the foot progression angle, were obtained. The analytical framework integrated k-means clustering, support vector machine classifiers, Shapley Additive exPlanations, and statistical waveform analyses. Clustering of the pre-operative dataset revealed three distinct subpopulations characterized by unique patterns in gait kinematics and joint moments. These subpopulations also differed in age, Kellgren-Lawrence score, and walking speed. Prior to total hip replacement, between 51.4% and 85.2% of hip osteoarthritis patients were classified as pathologic; following surgery, this proportion decreased to 27.8% - 51.8%. Hip flexion and rotation angles and moments were identified as the most important features for patient classification. The magnitude of gait improvement after total hip replacement varied across subpopulations, indicating subpopulation-specific responses to surgical intervention. In conclusion, patients with hip osteoarthritis demonstrate distinct subpopulation-specific gait adaptations, both before and after total hip replacement. Preoperative classification of patients into the identified subpopulations using machine learning approaches may facilitate the prediction of postoperative gait recovery and support the development of personalized treatment and rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.