Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41437104›Full record

SynthesisItalian journal of pediatrics2025

Impact of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in pediatric emergency departments: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Mohammed Alsabri, Mohammed Tarek Hasan, Shree Rath, Ahmed Bostamy Elsnhory, Mohamed Ismaeil Elnady, Ahmed Farid Gadelmawla, Suhel F Batarseh, Mohammed Alaswad

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Italian journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mohammed AlsabriEmergency Department, Al-Thawara Modern General Hospital, Sana'a, Yemen. alsabri5000@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1410-7680
Mohammed Tarek HasanFaculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.
Shree RathAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhubaneswar, India.
Ahmed Bostamy ElsnhoryEmergency Medicine Department, Al-Bank Al-Ahly Hospital, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed Ismaeil ElnadyFaculty of Medicine, Kafrelsheikh University, Kafr El-Sheikh, Egypt.
Ahmed Farid GadelmawlaFaculty of Medicine, Menoufia University, Menoufia, Egypt.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5802-2291
Suhel F BatarsehFaculty of Medicine, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8308-9834
Mohammed AlaswadFaculty of Human Medicine, University of Hama, Hama, Syria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8592-0898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is a bedside diagnostic tool clinicians use to provide immediate insights and guide therapeutic interventions. It has become increasingly significant in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) for diagnosing conditions, managing critical scenarios, and guiding procedures due to its portability, ease of use, and lack of radiation. This study aims to systematically review and analyze the efficacy of POCUS compared to conventional diagnostic methods in pediatric emergency settings. A literature search was conducted across PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to February 2025. The inclusion criteria were pediatric patients aged 1 month to 18 years in EDs, with studies comparing POCUS to conventional methods. Primary outcomes included first-attempt procedural success and overall success rates. Secondary outcomes included time to procedure completion, mean number of attempts, hospitalization rates, and discharge rates. Data analysis was conducted in R employing a random-effects model, with dichotomous data analyzed as risk ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI), and continuous data as unbiased standardized mean difference (SMD). Statistical significance was defined at p < 0.05. Eighteen randomized controlled trials involving 2264 patients met the inclusion criteria. POCUS significantly improved first-attempt success (RR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.09-1.43). The overall procedural success showed a significant benefit with POCUS (RR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03-1.22). However, no significant differences were noted in the time to procedure completion, number of attempts for a successful procedure, and rates of hospitalization and discharge to home. POCUS significantly improves first-attempt and overall procedural success rates in pediatric emergency settings, although it does not significantly reduce procedure times or the number of attempts. These findings underscore the importance of integrating POCUS into pediatric emergency care to enhance diagnostic accuracy and procedural success, though further research is needed to optimize its implementation across different age groups and procedures.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalPoint-of-Care SystemsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolHumansInfantRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicUltrasonographyEmergency departmentIntravenous accessLumbar puncturePediatricsPoint-of-care ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID41437104
PMCPMC12729704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.