ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2025
From midlife emergence to old-age divergence: an empirical study on structural gendered ageism in health service utilization in Tibet.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPopulation aging on the Tibetan Plateau may marginalize older women through combined gender and age bias. We measured sex-specific gaps in medical spending and service use across the life course. We tested whether gendered ageism appears in midlife and grows thereafter.
methodsWe analyzed 1,274,491 person-year health insurance reimbursement claims data in three major Tibetan cities (2021–2023). We examined four outcomes: annual total medical expenditure, outpatient visits, inpatient admissions, and tertiary-hospital admissions. The key exposure was sex. Age was divided into seventeen five-year groups. We applied LASSO to prevent multicollinearity. We then estimated two-way fixed-effects models. These models controlled for Andersen’s predisposing, enabling, and need covariates. We clustered errors at the person level.
resultsWomen’s spending gap appeared at ages 36–40 (β = − 299; 95% CI: − 425 to − 123). This gap represented roughly an 8% lower annual expenditure compared with men. The maximum deficit occurred at ages 71–75 (β = − 1,006; 95% CI: − 1,401 to − 610), with women spending 28% less than men. Women’s outpatient advantage peaked at ages 31–35 (β = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.61). This advantage faded after age 70. In the inpatient admissions model, women first showed a significant advantage at age 31–35 (β = 0.02 admissions). From age 46–50 through 61–65, this advantage ranged from 0.03 to 0.05 admissions. From age 36–40 onward, women had fewer tertiary-hospital admissions than men (β = − 0.01). This deficit persisted across all later age bands.
conclusionsGendered ageism emerges 30 years earlier than the conventional “65-plus” threshold. It accelerates through midlife and peaks in late old age among Tibetan women. Early policy action could interrupt this cumulative inequity. We recommend higher URRBMI reimbursement, “Plateau-Women-First” telemedicine channels, and flexible delayed retirement with pension top-ups. These measures would support gender-sensitive healthy aging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.