ArticleBMC health services research2025
Exploring allied health research capacity in Nigeria: a qualitative study of enablers and barriers.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAllied health professionals are integral to patient care, yet in low- and middle-income countries, their capacity to engage in research to improve the evidence base of their services remains underdeveloped. In Nigeria, most studies on research capacity are physician-focused with only limited empirical evidence for allied health cadres. This study explored the lived experiences, motivations, institutional enablers, and systemic barriers influencing research capacity among allied health professionals in a Nigerian tertiary hospital.
methodsA qualitative descriptive study was undertaken at the University of Benin Teaching Hospital. Six focus group discussions were conducted with pharmacists, medical laboratory scientists, radiographers, physiotherapists, nurses, and paramedics, alongside four key informant interviews with departmental and unit heads. Data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Rigour was maintained by triangulating data sources, peer debriefing, reflexive journalling, and an audit trail.
resultsSix themes were identified: (i) research exposure and experience, largely confined to undergraduate projects with limited methodological competence; (ii) fragmented and inequitable access to training; (iii) weak departmental and institutional infrastructure including limited funding and translation pathways (iv) intrinsic motivation driven by professional growth and patient outcomes, yet undermined by workload and time pressures; (v) systemic barriers such as ethics delays, poor interprofessional collaboration, and resource constraints; and (vi) recommendations such as protected research time, internal micro-grants, structured mentorship, departmental research units, and improved access to quality journals.
conclusionsAlthough AHPs demonstrated strong intrinsic motivation, structural constraints at team and organisational levels limit research engagement. Institutional reforms that embed mentorship, protected time and modest internal funding are feasible first steps to strengthen AHP research capacity at the study site. Further research should include multisite studies that explore the generalizability of the findings at country level and implementation studies that test, refine and scale interventions that strengthen allied health research capacity and, ultimately, improve patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.