Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436974›Full record

ReviewNeotropical entomology2025

Froth, Fields, and Future Directions: Scientometric and Integrative Review of the Recent Latin American Cercopidae Literature.

Jéssica Meneghetti, Kim Ribeiro Barão, Andressa Paladini

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neotropical entomology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jéssica MeneghettiPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Biodiversidade Animal, Depto de Ecologia E Evolução, Univ Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, Rio Grande Do Sul, Brazil. jemeneghetti94@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6633-6728
Kim Ribeiro BarãoLab de Sistemática E Diversidade de Artrópodes, Unidade Educacional Penedo, Univ Federal de Alagoas, Penedo, Alagoas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1432-1756
Andressa PaladiniPrograma de Pós-Graduação Em Entomologia, Lab de Sistemática E Biogeografia de Hemiptera, Depto de Zoologia, Univ Federal Do Paraná, Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8894-6092

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cercopidae, or spittlebugs, are xylem-feeding insects with significant economic impacts on pasture and sugarcane production in the Neotropics. Despite their importance, there has been no comprehensive evaluation of research trends on this group. This study presents a scientometric and integrative review of the literature of Cercopidae research conducted in Latin America and the Caribbean from 2001 to 2022. Using the Web of Science database, 154 articles were selected and analyzed for bibliometric patterns, thematic focus, and taxonomic coverage. The results revealed modest but consistent publication output over time, with Brazil accounting for the majority of studies. The most frequent research themes were agrisciences and ecology, particularly involving pest species of the genera Mahanarva Distant, 1909, Aeneolamia Fennah, 1949, and Deois Fennah, 1949. Studies in systematics encompassed the greatest species diversity, whereas other thematic areas showed limited taxonomic coverage. The majority of articles did not specify taxonomic identification procedures, raising concerns about data reliability. In summary, our findings reveal a clear bias toward economically important species and highlight thematic segregation among research areas. Strengthening interdisciplinary collaboration and improving taxonomic rigor are essential for advancing the understanding of Neotropical spittlebug diversity and for developing sustainable management strategies.

Indexed as

HemipteraAnimalsBibliometricsCaribbean RegionLatin AmericaAuchenorrhynchaBibliometric analysesPest insectsResearch trends

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.