ArticleBMC genomics2025
Synonymous and non-synonymous variants at splice junctions can disrupt splicing and are frequently linked to disease associated loss of function genes.
Article in BMC genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Synonymous variants in IRX4 and their association with congenital heart disease: an in-silico functional assessment.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRNA splicing facilitated by the spliceosome complex, relies on specific motifs at exon-intron junctions of pre-mRNAs to generate mature mRNAs. Mutations in splice junctions can disrupt splicing, potentially leading to premature protein truncation. Nucleotides within the exonic component of the junction are also essential for splicing. Evaluation of silent and missense variants in the exonic splice junction on RNA splicing is essential to investigate the significance of such variants in disease pathogenesis.
methodsWe analyzed cancer-associated silent and missense variants reported in the COSMIC database that are located within three nucleotides of splice donor and acceptor sites. We examined the prevalence of these variants in genes for which loss of function is a known mechanism of disease development. We also studied the performance of splicing impact prediction tools and evaluated their clinical relevance as well as their alignment with experimentally validated splicing outcomes.
resultsNucleotide composition analysis revealed a high preference for the nucleotide G at the donor 1 (d1) and acceptor (a1) positions, 87% and 69%, respectively. We observed a high prevalence of G > A and G > T variants at d1 and a1 positions. Interestingly, 66% to 86% of the identified variants at these positions are missense mutations, with G > T variants being specific for this type of mutation. Evolutionary conservation analysis indicates high nucleotide conservation for these positions at donor and acceptor sites, highlighting their importance at the nucleotide level. The frequently occurring variants are associated with tumor suppressor genes, and 58 of the top 100 genes have LOEUF scores below 1, indicating low tolerance to protein truncation. In contrast, such genes are rarely observed among population variants.
conclusionsOur data driven computational study emphasizes the importance of evaluating silent and missense variants at splice junctions to understand their impact on RNA splicing. These variants may have a neutral effect on protein function. However, evaluating their effect at the RNA level is essential to understanding the significance of these variants in disease pathogenesis. This is particularly important for genes in which loss of function is the mechanism of disease development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.