ArticleThe AAPS journal2025
Revisiting the Anti-Drug Antibody Assay Drug Tolerance of a Commercial Biological Product.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- ADA assays for high-dose biologics: redefining drug tolerance through clinical insights.Bioanalysis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Drug tolerance (DT) is a critical attribute of anti-drug antibody (ADA) assays for assessing clinical immunogenicity. We present a unique situation where a previously approved commercial product, atezolizumab, required re-assessment of the assay DT to meet an increased drug exposure demand arising from a new route of administration (subcutaneous) and align with updated health authority (HA) regulations. Rather than redevelop the existing ADA assay, which could disrupt ongoing clinical trials, we identified a new anti-idiotype (anti-ID) antibody surrogate that demonstrated that the assay maintained adequate DT for the new route of administration. This streamlined approach addressed concerns regarding higher serum trough concentrations with subcutaneous administration and stricter sensitivity expectations. We established a target DT concentration based on population pharmacokinetic modeling to ensure adequate ADA characterization at steady state. This case study highlights the value of having alternative surrogate ADAs and demonstrates that achieving stringent DT requirements can be accomplished without extensive method redevelopment. We also introduce the broader implications of surrogate ADA selection, binding kinetics, and the clinical relevance of achieving high DT in the context of atezolizumab's efficacy and safety profile. This work also emphasizes the importance of considering bioanalytical assay characteristics, such as DT, throughout a product's lifecycle.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41436902What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.