Observational studyDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Ten-Year Trend in 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Prescription Patterns and Treatment Outcomes in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis: An Analysis of Korean Health Insurance Data.
Observational study in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04499495 (A Retrospective Study to Assess 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Prescription Patterns and Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Korea), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Retrospective Study to Assess 5-Aminosalicylic Acid Prescription Patterns and Treatment Outcomes in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Korea
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient-Derived Claims Data on 5-ASA Utilization in Ulcerative Colitis: Strengths, Limitations, and Future Directions.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWhile the prevalence of ulcerative colitis (UC) is continuously increasing in Asia, published data related to the real-world use of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) for this population are sparse.
methodsUsing Korean national health insurance claims data between 2008 and 2019, distributions of the average daily dose of 5-ASA and mode of administration in the population with UC were analyzed. Treatment outcomes were evaluated through proportions of patients with insufficient response (other treatments added to or switched from 5-ASA), hospitalization, or surgery.
resultsThe analysis included data from 11,338 patients (mean age, 42.15 years; 59.53% male). During a median observation period of 1720 days, a tendency to decrease in rectal monotherapy proportion was observed, along with an increase in the proportion of oral and rectal combination therapies. The odds of prescribing standard-to-high dose 5-ASA (≥ 2g/day) increased significantly since 2013 (P < 0.05). The proportion of oral and rectal combination therapies with standard-to-high doses of 5-ASA increased from 18.09% in 2009 to 36.23% in 2017, whereas the proportions of oral monotherapy and oral and rectal combination therapies with low doses of 5-ASA decreased from 17.46% to 7.74% and from 11.64% to 8.98%, respectively. The incidence rates/1000 person-years for insufficient responses, UC-related hospitalizations, and UC-related surgery were 51.16, 13.40, and 1.13, respectively.
conclusionDuring the 10-year period, the 5-ASA prescription pattern shifted towards more frequent use of high-dose 5-ASA as a combination therapy, accompanied by a decrease in the frequency of rectal monotherapy prescriptions, which is consistent with current guidelines. Study Registration NCT04499495.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41436897What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.