ArticleJournal of movement disorders2026
Quantification of Loudness Instability in Tone Production in Embouchure Dystonia.
Article in Journal of movement disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Embouchure dystonia (ED) is a task-specific disorder of voluntary fine motor control that severely affects musicians' ability to perform tasks. One critical skill for professional musicians is the ability to produce sustained notes with consistent loudness; however, this ability has not been well defined in musicians with ED. The present study, therefore, compared the time-varying dynamics of loudness in musicians with ED with those in healthy musicians, as well as their relationship with the variability of the fundamental frequency (F0), by performing a sound analysis of sustained notes. The findings revealed significantly greater variability with respect to both loudness and F0 among ED patients. Furthermore, loudness and F0 variability were strongly correlated, suggesting a shared pathological basis. We conclude that F0 variability and loudness instability are reliable measures for objectively characterizing ED and assisting accurate diagnosis. The incorporation of quantitative acoustic tools into future diagnostic and therapeutic frameworks has the potential to increase the objectivity and reproducibility of ED assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.