ArticleScientific reports2025
An ethnic-sensitive hybrid framework for T2D prediction with explainable AI and weighted ensembles.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning Integration of Clinical and Molecular Biomarkers to Predict Vascular Complications in Type 2 Diabetes.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Explainable Meta-Learning Ensemble Framework for Predicting Insulin Dose Adjustments in Diabetic Patients: A Comparative Machine Learning Approach with SHAP-Based Clinical Interpretability.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a growing global health crisis, affecting over 537 million people as of 2021. Early prediction remains particularly challenging in low- and middle-income countries due to missing data, class imbalance, and population-specific risk factors. This study presents a four-stage predictive framework- Feature-Weighted Class-Adaptive Generative Imputation Network-Weighted Classifier Aggregation Ensemble (FW-CAGIN-WCAE)-designed to address these limitations. First, Zero-Threshold Feature Removal (ZTFR) is applied to eliminate low-quality variables. Second, missing values are imputed FW-CAGIN, a novel class-aware and feature-weighted GAN model that accounts for both class and feature importance. Third, a performance-weighted ensemble of 15 machine and deep learning algorithms is constructed. Finally, SHAP analysis is used to uncover population-specific risk indicators. The proposed method was evaluated on three benchmark datasets-PIDD, FHGDD, and BDD-and their combinations, using nested five-fold cross-validation. The model achieved a peak AUC of 0.936 ± 0.018 in PIDD-BDD combination and reduced the imputation mean absolute error (MAE) from 0.8028 to 0.0033. It also lowered AUC variability by 36.3% and improved the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) to 68.4 ± 20.5. SHAP analysis identified as a key predictive feature across both Asian and European populations. These findings demonstrate that the proposed framework offers an accurate, interpretable, and population-sensitive solution for early T2D detection, especially in resource-limited healthcare settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.