ArticleScientific reports2025
Probing the activity of cysteine cathepsins in inflammatory bowel diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- CTSS regulates macrophage lipid metabolic reprogramming and white matter repair after intracerebral hemorrhage.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Faecal Cathepsin B and S Are Associated With Liver Disease Severity and Adiposity in MASLD.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cathepsin S is a cysteine protease that has been implicated in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) for its ability to promote visceral pain. Given its pro-inflammatory roles, we hypothesized that cathepsin S would drive other symptoms associated with IBD. Using activity-based probes, we investigated cysteine cathepsin activation in human and murine colitis. We observed a significant increase in fecal cathepsin S in patients with ulcerative colitis compared to healthy controls, while cathepsin S in mucosal biopsies was unchanged. Mice with experimental colitis exhibited a modest increase in mucosal activity of both cathepsin S and X compared to naïve mice. Luminal secretion of cathepsin S was dramatically increased upon colitis induction, although differences between mouse colonies were observed. To investigate the contribution of cathepsin S and cathepsin X to colitis, we induced colitis in cathepsin-deficient mice. Cathepsin X-deficient mice exhibited no clear differences in disease indicators compared to wild-type mice. While cathepsin S-deficient mice exhibited less rectal bleeding, less splenomegaly and marginally improved histological scores, weight loss, diarrhea, colon shortening, and myeloperoxidase activity were not significantly different from wild-type mice. To determine whether pharmacologic inhibition of cathepsin S activity would ameliorate symptoms of colitis, a reversible inhibitor LY3000328 was administered to mice at the initiation of colitis. LY3000328 provoked a clear upregulation of cathepsin S and L activity in the mucosa, most likely through a compensatory mechanism. This increase in protease activity was associated with exacerbated histological scores and slight splenomegaly. Collectively, these results suggest that cathepsin S, but not cathepsin X, may contribute to some of the symptoms of experimental colitis. While cathepsin S has potential to be a therapeutic target in colitis, improved strategies to sustain its inhibition are required in future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.