Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436806›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

General elections in Poland (1990-2024) in the unified territorial aggregation: GeoElections Poland 1.0.

Przemysław Śleszyński, Mariusz Kowalski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Przemysław ŚleszyńskiPolish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Twarda 51/55, 00-818, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1369-6129
Mariusz KowalskiPolish Academy of Sciences, Institute of Geography and Spatial Organization, Twarda 51/55, 00-818, Warsaw, Poland. mar.kow@twarda.pan.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3417-0369

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki (National Science Centre) 2011/01/B/HS5/05898
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We share dataset of all general elections held in Poland between 1990 and 2024. These datasets correspond to two degrees of spatial aggregation: 41 constituencies for the Sejm and 94 for the Senate. In this dataset, for the first time, it was possible to collate voting results for electoral committees in unified territorial units. Such a compilation is unique and difficult to compile due to the multiple changes of administrative boundaries in Poland. In this dataset, we also organize more than 300 unique election committees into a uniform division into 5 basic political options. This data is publicly available but the way they are presented makes it impossible to create maps and comparisons, subject to time-consuming processing into any of the GIS systems. Therefore, we attach to the data a vector (SHP) map of electoral districts for the both chambers of the Polish parliament, to which it is easy to attach the developed relational dataset in XLS format in any year and aggregation.

Identifiers

PMID41436806
PMCPMC12847831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.