Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41436794›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Multilabel feature selection using graph neural networks and differential evolution optimization.

Ning Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ning PanHubei University Campus Construction and Information Office, Wuhan, 430062, Hubei, China. panda20087@hubu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, the exponential growth of high-dimensional data across domains such as data mining, machine learning, bioinformatics, social network analysis, and image processing has amplified the importance of feature selection as a primary method for dimensionality reduction. High-dimensional datasets often include redundant, noisy, and irrelevant features that hinder the development of accurate, efficient, and reliable learning models. This issue becomes even more critical in multi-label scenarios, where each instance may be associated with multiple labels, creating intricate interactions between features and labels as well as interdependencies among the labels themselves. Traditional feature selection techniques, designed primarily for single-label problems, struggle to address the complexities of multi-label data. Consequently, there is a pressing need for novel approaches that can effectively capture and utilize these complexities. This study introduces a hybrid method that combines the representational power of Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) with the optimization efficiency of Differential Evolution (DE) to tackle multi-label feature selection challenges. GNNs leverage graph structures to model complex relationships between features and labels, allowing for simultaneous consideration of feature relevance and label dependencies. DE, a robust global optimization algorithm, ensures the selection of an optimal subset of features by exploring vast search spaces and avoiding local optima. The proposed method was evaluated on six diverse datasets spanning text and image domains. GNN-DE achieves optimal classification performance while selecting fewer features, demonstrating its efficiency in reducing computational complexity. For datasets with complex label correlations, such as Enron and Scene, this method outperforms existing approaches.

Indexed as

Feature selectionHigh-dimensional dataHybrid approachOptimization algorithm

Identifiers

PMID41436794
PMCPMC12728201

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.